"Despite the many accomplishments of mankind, we owe our existence to six-inch of top soil and fact that it rains.” – Confucius
Sustainable agriculture is the efficient production of safe, high quality agricultural products, in a way that protects and improves the natural environment, the social and economic conditions of farmers, their employees and local communities, and safeguards the health and welfare of all farmed species.
For a sustainable agriculture system, it is essential to use renewable inputs (fertilizer, pesticides, water etc.) which benefit the plant and cause no or minimal damage to the environment. One possible way is to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Chemical fertilizers are being used in increasing amounts in order to increase the output in high yielding varieties of crop plants. Chemical fertilizers are industrially manipulated substances composed of known quantities of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and their exploitation causes air and groundwater pollution by eutrophication of water bodies.
However, chemical fertilizers cause pollution of water bodies as well as groundwater, besides getting stored in crop plants.
Modern agriculture is becoming more and more dependent upon the steady supply of synthetic inputs, mainly chemical fertilizers, which are products of fossil fuel (coal+ petroleum). Adverse effects are being observed due to the excessive and imbalanced use of these synthetic inputs. The soils have now become biologically dead. This situation has led to identifying harmless inputs like biofertilizers and biopesticides.
Environmentalists worldwide are pressing the market and society for a switch over to organic farming and biofertilizers. Organic farming aims to be a more environmentally sustainable form of agricultural production, combining best environmental practices, and emphasizing biodiversity protection and the preservation of natural resources. It also emphasizes high animal welfare standards and the avoidance of synthetic chemical inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Organic farming is one such strategy that not only ensures food safety, but also adds to the biodiversity of soil.
Organic farming is the raising of unpolluted crops through the use of manures, biofertilizers and biopesticides that provide optimum nutrients to crop plants, keeping pests and pathogens under control.
Generally, the term "fertilizer" is used for "fertilizing material or carrier", meaning any substance which contains one or more of the essential elements (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur, calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, molybdenum, copper, boron, zinc, chlorine, sodium, cobalt, vanadium and silicon). Thus, fertilizers are used to improve the fertility of the land.
The term "biofertiliser” has been defined in different ways over the past 20 years, which derives from the improved understanding of the relationships occurring between the rhizosphere microorganisms and the plant. Biofertilizers may be defined as "substances which contain living microorganisms that colonize the rhizosphere or the interior of the plants and promote growth by increasing the supply or availability of primary nutrients to the target crops, when applied to soils, seeds or plant surfaces”. According to Vessey, the term biofertiliser is associated to "a substance which contains living microorganisms which, when applied to seed, plant surfaces, or soil, colonizes the rhizosphere or the interior of the plant and promotes growth by increasing the supply or availability of primary nutrients to the host plant”. In 2005, biofertilizer was defined as "a product that contains living microorganisms, which exert direct or indirect beneficial effects on plant growth and crop yield through different mechanisms”. The definition was extended as the bacteria were used to control plant pathogens. Nevertheless, microorganisms which promote plant growth by control of harmful organisms, such as biofungicides, bionematocides, bioinsecticides, or any other products with similar activity favoring plant health, are generally defined as biopesticides, not as biofertilizers.
Biofertilizers have an ability to mobilize nutritionally important elements from non-usable to usable form. These microorganisms require organic matter for their growth and activity in soil and provide valuable nutrients to the plant. The microorganisms in biofertilizers restore the soil's natural nutrient cycle and build soil organic matter. Through the use of biofertilizers, healthy plants can be grown while enhancing the sustainability and the health of soil. Thus, the term biofertilizer means the product containing carrier based (solid or liquid) living microorganisms which are agriculturally useful in terms of nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization or nutrient mobilization, to increase the productivity of the soil and/or crop. Although at present biofertilizers are available for nitrogen and phosphorus only, efforts are on to identify the organisms which can solubilize or mobilize other minerals or nutrients. Recently, K-biofertilizer and Zn-biofertilizers have also been developed but these products are yet to be commercialized.
Biofertilizers are also living or biologically active products or microbial inoculants of bacteria, algae and fungi (separately or in combination) which are able to enrich the soil with nitrogen, phosphorus, organic matter etc. Biofertilizers act as a compound that enriches the nutrient quality of the soil by using microorganisms that establish symbiotic relationships with the plants.
Biofertilizers are low-cost renewable sources of plant nutrients which supplement chemical fertilizers. Biofertilizers generate plant nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorous through their activities in the soil or rhizosphere and make them available to the plants on the soil.
The use of biofertilizers is gaining importance because of the proper maintenance of soil health, the minimization of environmental pollutions and the cut-down in the use of chemicals.
Biofertilizers are one of the important components of integrated nutrient management, as they are a cost-effective and renewable source of plant nutrients to supplement and/or replace the chemical fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. These are preparations containing living cells or latent cells of efficient strains of microorganisms that help the uptake of nutrients in crop plants by their interactions in the rhizosphere when applied through seed or soil. They accelerate certain microbial processes in the soil which augment the extent of availability of nutrients in a form easily assimilated by plants.
Biopesticedes are certain types of pesticides derived from such natural materials as animals, plants, bacteria and certain minerals. Biopesticides are pest management agents based on living microorganisms or natural products. They have proven potential for pest management and they are being used across the world. Biopesticides are living organisms (natural enemies) or their products (phytochemicals, microbial products) or byproducts (semiochemicals) which can be used for the management of pests that are injurious to plants. They are living organisms which are cultivated in the laboratory on a large scale and are used and exploited experimentally for the control of harmful organisms. Examples include insects, viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa and nematodes.
Biopesticides have an important role in crop protection, although most commonly in combination with other tools including chemical pesticides as part of Biointensive Integrated Pest Management. Biopesticides or biological pesticides pose less threat to the environment or to human health because they are specifically targeted to a single pathogenic pest.
The three main types of biopesticides are microbial pesticides, biochemical and plant-incorporated protectants.
Microbial pesticides contain active ingredients of specific types of microorganisms, such as a fungus, bacterium or protozoan. Each active ingredient can be utilized to target a specific type of pest. For example, some fungi can suppress certain weeds, while certain types of bacteria can control different species of insect larvae, such as mosquitoes, moths or flies. The most commonly utilized microbial pesticides come from strains of the bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The bacterial strains manufacture different protein mixes that can target specific insect larvae and will not affect other organisms.
Biochemical pesticides use natural substances like insect sex pheromones, which can disrupt mating, thus controlling the insect population. Other types of biochemical pesticides can include the use of hormones, enzymes and scented plant extracts to attract and trap certain pests. These are good alternatives to conventional pesticides because the latter often contain synthetic toxic material to destroy insects.
By introducing genetic material into plants, scientists can make plants produce pesticide substances which can target and kill specific pests. In some cases, the addition of a gene with a particular Bt protein can produce these plant incorporated protectants, or plant pesticides.
There are considerable potential benefits to agriculture and public health programmes through the use of biopesticides. The interest in biopesticides is based on the advantages associated with such products, as follows:
1) They are less toxic and inherently less harmful and cause less environmental load;
2) Designed to affect only one specific pest or, in some cases, a few target organisms;
3) Often effective in very small quantities and often decompose quickly, thereby resulting in lower exposures and largely avoiding the pollution problems.
4) When used as a component of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programmes, biopesticides can contribute greatly.
5) They are safer for humans and the environment.
However, for the effective use of biological pesticides, it is important to have extensive knowledge of pest management.
In recent years, a microbial green revolution is underway. Biofertilizers have their own advantages over chemical fertilizers and are economically and environmentally friendly as well. With the increasing demand in agriculture, it has become important for scientists and society to increase the productivity of the sector by using various fertilizers, insecticides and pesticides. However, with the tremendous use of these products, the soil has been badly affected because of the depletion of the essential minerals of the soil. Therefore, to overcome this problem, it has become important to use a different remedy for the production of various biofertilizers. They have the best economic value.
The following basic reasons to explore biofertilizers are outlined:
Biofertilizers are ready-to-use live formulates of such beneficial microorganisms, which upon application to seeds, roots or soil, mobilize the availability of nutrients by their biological activity in particular, and help build up the microflora and, in turn, the soil health in general, which consequently benefits crops. Biofertilizers are designed to improve the soil fertility in N and P. They provide growth promoting substances.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization induces drought tolerance in plants by:
Biofertilizers strengthen the soil profile, leave water sources untainted and improve plant growth without detrimental side effects.
We can list the basic advantages of using biofertilizers:
As disadvantages, using biofertilizers:
Biofertilizers add nutrients through the natural processes of fixing atmospheric nitrogen, solubilizing phosphorus, and stimulating plant growth through the synthesis of growth-promoting substances. They can be categorised in different ways based on their nature and function.
One simple broadly disseminated classification is as follows:
This group fixes nitrogen symbiotically. Nitrogen biofertilizers help to correct the nitrogen levels in the soil. Nitrogen is a limiting factor for plant growth because plants need a certain amount of nitrogen in the soil to thrive. Different biofertilizers have an optimum effect for different soils, so the choice of nitrogen biofertilizer to be used depends on the cultivated crop. Rhizobia are used for legume crops, Azotobacter or Azospirillum for non-legume crops, Acetobacter for sugarcane and blue-green algae and Azolla for lowland rice paddies.
Just like nitrogen, phosphorus is also a limiting factor for plant growth. Phosphorus biofertilizers help the soil to reach its optimum level of phosphorus and correct the phosphorus levels in the soil. Unlike nitrogen biofertilizers, the usage of phosphorus biofertilizers is not dependent on the crops cultivated on the soil. Phosphatika is used for all crops with Rhizobium, Azotobacter, Azospirillum and Acetobacter.
Biofertilizers are also used for enrichment of your compost and for enhancement of the bacterial processes that break down the compost waste. Suitable biofertilizers for compost use are cellulolytic fungal cultures and Phosphotika and Azotobacter cultures. A 100% pure eco-friendly organic fertilizer is Vermi Compost: this organic fertilizer has nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, organic carbon, sulphur, hormones, vitamins, enzymes and antibiotics, which helps to improve the quality and quantity of yield. It is observed that, due to continuous misuse of chemical fertilizers, the soil looses its fertility and becomes saline day by day. To overcome such problems, natural farming is the only remedy and Vermi compost is the best solution.
Another eco-friendly organic fertilizer which is prepared from sugar industry waste material that is decomposed and enriched with various plants and human-friendly bacteria and fungi is Biocompost. Biocompost consists of nitrogen, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and various beneficial fungi like the decomposing fungus Trichoderma viridae, which protects plants from various soil-borne diseases and also helps to increase the soil fertility, resulting in a good quality product for farmers.
A more detailed classification of biofertilizers is as follows:
Just to remind, biofertilizers are defined as biologically active products or microbial inoculants of bacteria, algae and fungi (separately or in combination), which may facilitate the biological nitrogen fixation for the benefit of plants. Biofertilizers also include organic fertilizers (manure, etc.), which are rendered in an available form due to the interaction of microorganisms or due to their association with plants.
Biofertilizers thus include the following:
The various biofertilizers are as follows:
Free-Living Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria:
They live freely in the soil and perform nitrogen fixation. Some of them are saprotrophic, living on organic remains, e.g., Azotobacter, Bacillus polymyxa, Clostridium, Beijerinckia. They are further distinguished into aerobic and anaerobic forms.
The property of nitrogen fixation is also found in photoautotrophic bacteria, e.g., Rhizobium, Rhodopseudomonas, Rhodospirillum, Chromatium. Inoculation of soil with these bacteria helps in increasing the yield and cutting down on nitrogen fertilizers. For example, Azotobacter occurring in fields of cotton, maize, jowar and rice not only increases the yield, but also cuts down on nitrogen fertilizer to about 10–25 kg/ha. Its inoculant is available under the trade name of Azotobactrin.
Rhizobia are soil bacteria which are able to colonize the legume roots and fix the atmospheric nitrogen symbiotically. The morphology and physiology of rhizobia will vary from free-living conditions to the bacteroid of nodules. They are the most efficient biofertilizer as per the quantity of fixed nitrogen. There are seven genera that are highly specific in forming nodules in legumes, referred to as a cross-inoculation group.
Azotobacter is a genus of heterotrophic free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria present in alkaline and neutral soils. It is aerobic in nature, recommended for non-leguminous crops like paddy, millets, cotton, tomato, cabbage and other monocotyledonous crops. Azotobacter also produces growth-promoting compounds. Azotobacter performs well if the soil organic matter content is high. Response to Azotobacter has been seen in rice, maize, cotton, sugarcane, pearl millet, vegetable and some plantation crops.
Free-Living Nitrogen-Fixing Cyanobacteria:
A number of free-living cyanobacteria, or blue-green algae, have the property of nitrogen fixation, e.g., Anabaena, Nostoc, Aulosira, Totypothrix, Cylindrospermum, Stigonema. Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic microorganisms. Therefore, they add organic matter as well as extra nitrogen to the soil. These chlorophyll-containing prokaryotic organisms fix atmospheric nitrogen.
Aulosira fertilissima is considered to be the most active nitrogen fixer of rice fields. Cylindrospermum licheniforme grows in sugarcane and maize fields. Cyanobacteria are extremely low-cost biofertilisers. Phosphate, molybdenum and potassium are supplied additionally.
Loose Association of Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria:
This bacterial group live partly within the root and partly outside. There is a fair degree of symbiosis between the host and the bacteria. Hence, they are called associative symbiotic bacteria. Azospirillum is an important bacterium in this group, recommended for millets, grass, wheat, maize, sorghum, rice etc.
Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria:
They form a mutually beneficial association with the plants. The bacteria obtain food and shelter from plants. In return, they give to the plants part of their fixed nitrogen. The most important group of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria are rhizobia (Sg. rhizobium). They form nodules on the roots of legume plants. There are about a dozen Rhizobium species which form associations with the roots of different legumes, e.g. R. leguminosarum, R. lupini, R. trifolii, R. meliloti, R. phaseoli.
These bacteria, also called rhizobia, can live freely in the soil but cannot fix nitrogen except for a strain of cowpea Rhizobium. They develop the ability to fix nitrogen only when they are present inside the root nodules. In the nodule cells, bacteria (bacteroids) lie in groups surrounded by the membrane of the host cells, which is lined by a pink-red pigment called leghemoglobin. Presently cultures of Rhizobium specific for different crops are raised in the laboratory.
Frankia, a nitrogen-fixing mycelial bacterium (actinomycete), is associated symbiotically with the root nodules of several non-legume plants like Casuarina, Alnus (Alder) Myrica, Rubus etc. The leaves of a few plants (e.g., Ardisia) develop special internal cavities for providing space to symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, Xanthomonas and Mycobacterium. Such leaves are a constant source of nitrogen fertilizer to the soil.
Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixing Cyanobacteria:
Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) form symbiotic associations with several plants, e.g. cycad roots, liverworts, Azolla (fern), and lichenized fungi. Azolla is an aquatic floating fern, found in temperate climate suitable for paddy cultivation. The fern appears as a green mat over water, which becomes reddish due to excess anthocyanin pigmentation. The blue-green algae, cyanobacteria (Anabaena azollae), present as a symbiont with this fern in the lower cavities actually fixes atmospheric nitrogen.
Azolla pinnata is a small free-floating fresh water fern which multiplies rapidly, doubling every 5–7 days. The fern can coexist with rice plants because it does not interfere with their growth.
Anabaena azollae resides in the leaf cavities of the fern. It fixes nitrogen. A part of the fixed nitrogen is excreted in the cavities and becomes available to the fern. The decaying fern plants release this nitrogen for utilization by the rice plants. When a field is dried up at the time of harvesting, the fern functions as green manure, decomposing and enriching the field for the next crop.
Microphos Biofertilizers:
They release phosphate from bound and insoluble states, e.g., Bacillus polymyxa, Pseudomonas striata, Aspergillus species.
Mycorrhiza (Pl. Mycorrhizae, Frank, 1885):
The mycorrhiza is a mutually beneficial or symbiotic association of a fungus with the root of a higher plant. The most common fungal partners of mycorrhiza are Glomus species. Mycorrhizal roots show a sparse or dense wooly growth of fungal hyphae on their surface. Root cap and root hairs are absent.
Mycorrhiza is a potential biofertilizer which mobilizes P, Fe, Zn, B and other trace elements. It supplies moisture from far-off inches and is ideal for long duration crops. It can be stored up to 2 years and is dry powder resistant.
Depending upon the residence of the fungus, mycorrhizae are of two types— ectomycorrhiza and endomycorrhiza.
Ectomycorrhiza (= Ectotrophic Mycorrhiza):
The fungus forms a mantle on the surface of the root. Internally, it lies in the intercellular spaces of the cortex. The root cells secrete sugars and other food ingredients into the intercellular spaces that feed the fungal hyphae. The exposed fungal hyphae increase the surface of the root to several times. They perform several functions for the plant as follows:
Endomycorrhiza (Endotrophic Mycorrhiza):
Fewer fungal hyphae lie on the surface. The remaining live in the cortex of the root, mostly in the intercellular spaces with some hyphal tips passing inside the cortical cells, e.g., grasses, crop plants, orchids and some woody plants. At the seedling stage of orchids, the fungal hyphae also provide nourishment by forming nutrient-rich cells called pelotons. Intracellular growth occurs in order to obtain nourishment because, unlike ectomycorrhiza, the cortical cells do not secrete sugars in the intercellular spaces.
Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi possess special structures known as vesicles and arbusculars. VAM fungi are intercellular, obligate endosymbionts and, on establishment on the root system, act as an extended root system. Besides harvesting moisture from deeper and faraway nitches in the soil, they also harvest various micronutrients and provide them to the host plants. VAM facilitates the phosphorus nutrition by not only increasing its availability, but also increasing its mobility. VAM are obligate symbionts and improve the uptake of Zn, Co, P and H2O. Its large-scale application is limited to perennial crops and transplanted crops. A single fungus may form a mycorrhizal association with a number of plants, e.g., Glomus.
The different types of biofertilizers are preparations made from natural beneficial microorganisms. They are safe for all plants, animals and human beings. Being beneficial to crops and natural nutrient cycles, they not only are environmentally friendly, but also help in saving of chemical inputs.
Main roles of biofertilizers:
At present, biofertilizers are supplied to the farmers as carrier-based inoculants. As an alternative, liquid formulation technology has been developed which has more advantages than the carrier inoculants.
The advantages of liquid biofertilizer over conventional carrier-based biofertilizers are listed below:
Characteristics of different liquid biofertilizers
Rhizobium
Physical features of liquid Rhizobium biofertilizer:
Azospirillum
Physical features of liquid Azospirillum biofertilizer:
Role of liquid Azospirillum under field conditions:
Azotobacter
Physical features of liquid Azotobacter biofertilizer:
The pigment that is produced by Azotobacter in aged culture is melanin, which is due to oxidation of tyrosine by a copper-containing enzyme, tyrosinase. The colour can be seen in liquid forms. Some of the pigmentations are described below:
Acetobacter
These are sacharophillic bacteria associated with sugarcane, sweet potato and sweet sorghum plants. Acetobacter fixes 30 kg N/ha/year. This bacterium is mainly commercialized for sugarcane crops. It is known to increase the yield by 10–20 t/acre and sugar content by about 10–15 percent.
Advantages of the production technology of biofertilizers
Carrier-based | Liquid-based |
---|---|
Cheap | Longer shelf-life |
Easier to produce | Easier to produce |
Less investment | Temperature tolerant |
High cell counts | |
Contamination-free | |
More effective | |
Product can be 100% sterile | |
Disadvantages | |
Low shelf-life | High cost |
Temperature sensitive | Higher investment for production unit |
Contamination prone | |
Low cell counts | |
Less effective | |
Automation difficult |
There are three main ways of using biofertilizers (liquid and carrier).
Seed treatment
One package of the inoculant is mixed with 200 mL of rice kanji to make a slurry. The seeds required for an acre are mixed in the slurry so as to have a uniform coating of the inoculant over the seeds and then shade-dried for 30 minutes. The shade-dried seeds should be sown within 24 hours. One package of the inoculant (200 g) is sufficient to treat 10 kg of seeds.
Seedling root dip
Suspend 1 to 2 kg each of nitrogen-fixing (Azotobacter/Azospirillum) and phosphate-solubilizing biofertilizer into just sufficient quantity of water (5–10 L depending upon the quantity of seedlings to be planted in one acre). Dip the roots of seedlings in this suspension for 20–30 min before transplanting. In case of paddy, make a bed of sufficient size (2 m x 1.5 m x 0.15 m) in the field, fill it with 5 cm of water and suspend 2 kg each of Azospirillum and phosphate-solubilizing biofertilizer and mix thoroughly. Now dip the roots of seedlings in this bed for 8–12 hours (overnight) and then transplant.
Although the biofertilizer technology is a low cost, eco-friendly technology, several constraints limit the application or implementation of the technology. The constraints may be environmental, technological, infrastructural, financial, human resources, unawareness, quality, marketing, etc. The different constraints, in one way or another, affect the technique at production or marketing or usage.
Biofertilizers have a great role in increasing the crop production. They improve the soil health status and provide different growth-promoting hormones and phytohormones to the plant. Moreover, they do not leave residual effects like those of chemical fertilizers. Thus, the use of biofertilizers could be the proper option for sustainable agriculture.
The above-mentioned acts laid down the basis for development of organic farming compliant with the sustainable development requirements in the agricultural sector and its contribution to biodiversity conservation.
In the EU, microorganisms (bacteria, viruses and fungi) are included as possible inputs in the EU Commission Regulation n. 889/2008 on organic production, but only for the biological control of pests and diseases. As such, they are thus listed within the legal framework dealing with plant protection products, as biocontrol agents.
Another document is the EU Landfill Directive, which currently is the primary driver for initiatives on biodegradable waste. Its implementation at a national level often also includes separate collection of organic waste, and composting/AD as its primary destination. Anyway, no general provision is included for the destination of biodegradables; hence, the way that composting and anaerobic digestion shall be combined with incineration will be a matter of local strategies, and they factually vary widely from country to country.
REGULATIONS Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91
Biofertilizers increase the availability of plant nutrients and can help in maintenance of the soil fertility over a long period. As discussed earlier, some microorganisms have the beneficial role of biological nitrogen fixation to supply nitrogen to crops, solubilizing insoluble phosphates to plant-available (soluble) forms and synthesizing biomass for manuring of crops like rice. Biofertilizers are, therefore, economical, renewable and eco-friendly, but they cannot totally replace chemical fertilizers. Biofertilizer use is an important component of Integrated Nutrient Management and organic farming. These technologies are becoming vital in modern-day agricultural practices. The changing scenario of agricultural practices and environmental hazards associated with chemical fertilizers demand a more significant role of biofertilizers in coming years.
8 Make more nutrients available to the crops.
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi-ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.